We All Bleed Red

Something that has bothered me for awhile is the discriminatory practices concerning blood donation in America.  In 1983, the FDA instituted a policy banning blood from any man who has engaged in “sexual activity” with another man since 1977 (you can follow the link to read it if you want to, but I caution you that it might make your blood boil - it did mine!) – to put this into perspective, a man can have unprotected sex with all the female prostitutes he wants to, and he will only be deferred a year.  This is not discrimination against unsafe sex – which anyone can commit – it’s discrimination against identity. There is no consideration made for protected, monogamous or even one-time-only sex among the gay community and the message that’s being sent is that all gay and bisexual men have AIDS. Not only that, but with the improvements in screening practices, it’s possible to detect HIV within 11 days of infection… implying that gay and bisexual men have undetectable AIDS?

This initiative was originally aimed at reducing the risk of transmitting HIV through blood donation by eliminating queer men who had increased risk during this decade.  This policy has become outdated and offensive to men in the GLBT community – and it seems particularly ridiculous during this time in our nation’s history when blood is in short supply and blood screening has become mandatory.

So what do we do?

San Jose University banned blood drives at the school instituted by the American Red Cross in protest for their position (based on the FDA’s policies) and this follows cancellations that were instated at Southern Oregon University and other schools over the last few years.  While I applaud the efforts of these schools to raise awareness and stand against discrimination, I can’t help thinking about the people who are really paying the price – those who are in need of blood and will die as a result of insufficient resources.

We need to continue to campaign for change in blood donation regulations, but that’s a time-consuming process and every day that’s lost brings us closer to depleting the blood we have in storage.

Enter Ryan Tauriainen, a student at Middlebury College in Oregon. His solution is a “sponsor blood drive” where a student donating blood would be asked to sign a statement saying they are donating for a gay student who cannot.  This is combined with his efforts to open dialogue with those who are authority at the Red Cross as well as continuing activism to raise awareness about these discriminatory policies.

We still have a long way to go before the stigma is removed from homosexuality in America – but continuing to follow policies that serve to reinforce mistaken stereotypes and outdated fears will only impede this process.  We need to raise awareness and open dialogue to change the laws and statutes that hold the GLBT community in an unfair and oppressive grip.

Take time today to sign a petition to change the FDA’s Blood Donation Policy and help spread the word.  In light of the recent ruling in California to allow for same-sex marriage, I’m optimistic that the tide is turning and legislation will eventually promote equality.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.